Home > Sex/Gender Differences, The Face > What Makes a Face Masculine?

What Makes a Face Masculine?

January 25, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments

Humans are sexually dimorphic: men are about 15% bigger than women. The usual – and generally accepted – explanation for this size difference is male/male competition for mates. Weston and colleagues measured dry skulls from South Africa to explore which features would deviate from ontogenetic scaling. That is, which features on male skulls would be more than 15% larger than the same features on female skulls?

The white lines indicate those features of the male skull which are larger than expected by ontogenetic scaling. The vertical black line represents the baseline of comparison. There is an additional feature of male skulls that is larger than expected: orbital width (men’s eye sockets are wider).

 

The white lines indicate those features of the male jaw which are larger than expected by ontogenetic scaling. The vertical black line represents the baseline of comparison. There are two additional features of male jaws that are larger than expected that are not indicated here: ramus (vertical bone at the back of the jaw) height and width at its uppermost.

 

Additionally, relative to cheek width, male faces project further forward than expected.

 

Because these facial features exhibit greater than 15% variation between males and females, they are likely to result from a separate evolutionary dynamic than caused the bodily dimorphism. Absent any compelling argument from natural selection, sexual selection – female preference – is the most likely candidate explanation. Weston & her colleagues suggest that human females may have preferred  males who appeared less aggressive (Weston et.al. 2004).

Weston’s argument offers a solution to a puzzlement that I have had about male facial attractiveness: throughout the majority of human prehistory most men’s facial features would not be visible since we are a long-haired, bearded animal. At the risk of appearing to make a bad pun, the fact that the bulk of these masculine facial characteristics are visible on an unshaven face adds significantly to the face validity of the assertion.

Weston EM, Friday AE, Johnstone RA, Schrenk F (2004) Wide faces or large canines? The attractive versus the aggressive primate. Proc R Soc London Ser B Suppl, Biology Letters 271: S416–S419.

Eleanor M. Weston, Adrian E. Friday, Pietro Liò (2007). Biometric Evidence that Sexual Selection Has Shaped the Hominin Face PLoS ONE, 2 (8) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000710
 

Advertisements
  1. Soares
    March 15, 2010 at 9:18 pm

    African peoples don’t have much beard, don’t they?

    • whooke
      April 25, 2010 at 10:53 am

      There are quite a few problems with racial categorizations (there’s a nice introduction here: http://anthro.palomar.edu/vary/vary_2.htm). Given that, it’s probably more accurate to say that men of European descent are more likely to be unusually hairy….

      Wayne

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: